What does this workflow do?
Code assistants propose, explain, or modify software. Their inference cost should be assessed alongside whether the change satisfies the task and passes the project’s checks.
o10Reviewed 2026-09-06
Code Assistant inference
Code assistants propose, explain, or modify software. Their inference cost should be assessed alongside whether the change satisfies the task and passes the project’s checks.
Workload design guide. Any example volumes or cost estimates below are illustrative, not measured customer results.
SummaryKey takeaways
What you need to know
Start with the core questions, then examine the examples and tradeoffs below.
01Deep dive
Design the workflow before choosing a model
Separate repository search, planning, editing, and validation. Give editing tools access only to the intended workspace and capture the diff alongside test results.
Define a representative input and an explicit acceptance criterion. Keep model and prompt versions with the result so quality changes can be investigated.
02Deep dive
Evaluate outcomes and failure modes
Measure task completion, test outcomes, regressions, and reviewer correction time.
Use representative repository tasks with known acceptance criteria. Include ambiguous requirements, failing tests, unfamiliar dependencies, and changes spanning several files.
Compare candidate routes on the same held-out examples. Report how many examples were evaluated and inspect failures rather than relying on a single average score.
03Deep dive
Roll out with a measurable cost baseline
Use a reviewed patch as the initial output. Expand autonomy only after measuring failures and establishing an approval boundary for releases and other consequential actions.
Calculate cost per accepted outcome using input and output tokens, retrieval or tool fees, retries, and review effort. A lower token price is useful only if the total workflow still meets its requirements.
o10 can provide model routing for the inference steps. Your application remains responsible for workflow permissions, tool behavior, and deciding whether the final result is acceptable.
SourceMethodology
Measure performance and total cost on representative tasks before rolling out this workflow.
FAQFrequently asked questions
Common questions
What should be measured before changing the route?
Record the current workflow’s outcome quality, latency distribution, failure rate, and fully loaded cost. Compare the candidate on the same tasks and include failed attempts and retries.
Are the savings figures on this site guaranteed?
No. Calculator inputs and workload examples are illustrative. Establish your own baseline and measure the candidate under comparable conditions before projecting savings.
o10Set the envelope. o10 holds it.
See what you're overpaying.
Paste a week of traffic. Get the number that books the audit.
See what you're overpaying →verified savings methodology · State of Inference Spend 2026